Friday, February 14, 2020

How does the Bible describe sin ( Hamartiology) Essay

How does the Bible describe sin ( Hamartiology) - Essay Example In this paper the author analyses a part of systematic theology, Hamartiology, as the official ‘Doctrine of Sin’ and tends to explicate the meaning, denotation and consequences of sin. Hamartiology has been a controversial subject amongst experts, some believe in the original sin point of view which was given to us by Apostle Paul, whereas some such argue that humans were either not at all affected by the fall of man, another segment of Hamartiology also discusses that whether humans were or were not affected by the fall of man is irrelevant, but the human race is sinful by nature because of the devil. Except for the concept of original sin, the Hamartiology section in theology also deals with other types of sin, and exactly describes what God actually means when he mentions sin in the great book. Numerous excerpts from the testaments have been taken to express the Bible’s outlook towards sin, which in abstract point towards two meanings; the first being transgres sion and the second to miss or overlook the mark. Within this essay sin, its origination, and its nature have also been discussed thoroughly. A major section of Hamartiology deals with the comprehension of ‘original sin’, which states that, us humans being descendants of Adam and Eve are not what God actually crafted as most Christians believe. Within the bible, numerous words are used which are synonymic to sin, some of the terms are unrighteousness, transgression, against the will of god, defiling god, non-belief in god, and of course trespassing.

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 43

Questions - Essay Example For instance, dressing codes that people currently embrace can be unethical according to perception of people 2o years ago. Lawrence Hinamn refers to ethics as a social responsibility that every member of the society has to take into account. Rationality of human beings provides an opportunity to edit codes of ethics in ways that fit them. Ethical pluralism explains the essence of personal judgments of morality. It helps in understanding moral differences in generations and societies in relation to social dynamics (Pojman, 2006). Issues such as involvement of the media in the spread of immorality can be understood through the pluralistic approach to moral theory. The book uses features such as â€Å"Ethical Inventory† to clarify several ethical theories. Virtue ethics deals with the society in a general perspective requiring people to hold mutual responsibility in ethics. Hinman uses philosophical interpretation to enable readers to get a deep understanding of the facts. The use of current issues responds to the dynamic nature of social